Trump’s intention to resort to centuries-old laws to achieve his goals

January 8, 2025
An american flag and a judge 's gavel on a wooden table.

President-elect Donald Trump is planning to use ancient laws and legal theories to push his agenda during his first year in office, particularly on issues such as immigration and birthright citizenship. According to CNN, Trump has expressed his intention to invoke a 1798 law to accelerate deportations and has suggested the possibility of using a law tied to the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794 to deploy the military on U.S. soil.

Immigration is not the only issue on Trump’s mind. Some of his allies, including Vice President-elect JD Vance, have proposed enforcing an 1873 chastity law, known as the Comstock Act, to prohibit mailing abortion drugs. However, Trump has stated that he does not plan, in principle, to use this law to restrict access to abortion drugs, although he has left open the possibility that this may change in the future, as reported by CNN.

Trump has framed these laws as a way to return to times of greater political power in the United States, suggesting that he could use the same powers granted by presidents like John Adams and Thomas Jefferson to confront what he has called the «enemy from within» and carry out mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. CNN explains that some of the laws Trump is considering have complicated histories, which could lead to confrontations with a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court that will closely monitor the actions of the new president.

For example, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which Trump has specifically mentioned during his campaign, allows the federal government to expedite deportations of citizens from «hostile nations» during wartime. This law was last used during World War II to intern Japanese citizens, an act that was upheld by the Supreme Court in a controversial 1944 decision, as noted by CNN.

According to CNN, in an interview earlier in 2024 with Time magazine, Trump spoke about using the military or the National Guard to assist with the deportation of millions of undocumented immigrants.

The current version of the law was last invoked by President George H. W. Bush during the 1992 Los Angeles riots that followed the acquittal of four white police officers for the beating of Rodney King.

Revisiting Birthright Citizenship

Another issue Trump has mentioned is his interest in reopening the long-standing debate over birthright citizenship, which has been law since the Supreme Court ruled in 1898 that people born on U.S. soil are citizens, even if their parents are not.

The president-elect has long criticized birthright citizenship, which is protected by the 14th Amendment.

Still, his allies are considering directing the State Department to deny passports to children of undocumented parents and tightening the requirements for tourist visas to end «birth tourism,» sources familiar with the planning told CNN in December. Denying passports to U.S.-born individuals would trigger immediate lawsuits.

However, history is believed to work against Trump in this case.

At Pikes Peak Immigration, we will continue to monitor what happens regarding immigration once Trump takes office, and we will keep fighting for the rights of immigrants, no matter the circumstances.

If you have questions or need legal advice, call us at 719-602-4477.

 

Trump’s intention to resort to centuries-old laws to achieve his goals
June 12, 2026
Major Victory for Employers, Universities, and Highly Skilled Foreign Workers
By 7070266136 May 21, 2026
Rising immigration enforcement, policy changes, and growing uncertainty are discouraging many lawful permanent residents from pursuing the protection and stability that U.S. citizenship is meant to provide.
By 7070266136 May 11, 2026
Various recent media outlets confirm that a new rule by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), under the U.S. Department of Transportation, prevents immigrants with work authorization—including asylum seekers, refugees, and DACA recipients—from obtaining or maintaining commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs), affecting hundreds of thousands of drivers. Reports from outlets such as The Washington Post, The Guardian, and CalMatters indicate that the measure is already causing the loss of licenses and jobs, as well as potential impacts on the supply chain. Meanwhile, labor and legal organizations have filed lawsuits, such as Rivera Lujan v. FMCSA , arguing that the rule is illegal, discriminatory, and severely harms the livelihoods of thousands of families. The administration implemented a rule that prevents asylum seekers, refugees, and DACA recipients from obtaining or renewing CDLs.  Lawsuits say it will “destroy livelihoods” A transportation-focused publication confirms the language used by plaintiffs: Attorneys stated that the rule “threatens to destroy the livelihoods” of thousands of drivers. It explains that asylum seekers, refugees, and DACA recipients are excluded. Real impact: loss of licenses and jobs A recent CalMatters report shows that this is already happening: Thousands of immigrant truck drivers have already lost their licenses in California. Many have been left unemployed and in legal uncertainty. It is estimated that up to 61,000 could lose their licenses in that state alone. Economic and industry effects Driving schools report a sharp decline in student enrollment due to the new rules. Companies and analysts warn that the measure reduces the workforce and may increase costs. Implementation of the rule (key detail) Legal and regulatory sources confirm: The rule went into effect on March 16, 2026. It only allows CDLs for certain visa types (H-2A, H-2B, E-2). Other work-authorized statuses no longer qualify. Recently, The Guardian published an article analyzing the impact of this measure on driving schools. Start CDL, a driving school founded by immigrants Asyl Kushnir and Gene Moik, is facing possible closure due to a sharp decline in student enrollment following new restrictions implemented during the administration of Donald Trump. Enrollment dropped from nearly 100 students per month to just 25–30, seriously affecting revenue despite high demand for drivers. According to its owners, the changes have created confusion and reduced access for immigrants with work permits—such as asylum seekers, refugees, and DACA recipients—who previously saw trucking as a stable job opportunity. This serves as a small example of the different angles from which this new policy must be analyzed. In summary ✔️ The rule exists and is already in effect ✔️ It directly affects immigrants with work authorization ✔️ There are active lawsuits (such as the one you mentioned) ✔️ Media reports confirm real losses of jobs and licenses
More Posts →